https://scienca.org/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Scienca
sciXplorer - User contributions [en]
2026-08-24T07:29:51Z
User contributions
MediaWiki 1.19.24
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=sciXplorer:Privacy_policy
sciXplorer:Privacy policy
2016-08-21T00:27:30Z
<p>Scienca: Created page with "PRIVACY POLICY Thank you for visiting SciXplorer. This privacy policy tells you how we use personal information collected at this website. Please read this privacy policy bef..."</p>
<hr />
<div>PRIVACY POLICY<br />
<br />
Thank you for visiting SciXplorer. This privacy policy tells you how we use personal information collected at this website. Please read this privacy policy before using the website or submitting any personal information. By using the website, you are accepting the practices described in this privacy policy. These practices may be changed, but any changes will be posted and will only apply to activities and information on a going forward, not retroactive basis. You are encouraged to review the privacy policy whenever you visit the site to keep track of the policy changes and make sure that you understand how any personal information you provide will be used.<br />
<br />
Note: the privacy practices set forth in this privacy policy are for this website only. If you link to other websites, please review the privacy policies posted at those websites.<br />
<br />
Collection of Information<br />
We collect personally identifiable information, like names, email addresses, etc., when voluntarily submitted by our visitors. This information is only used to fulfill your specific request and to sign you up for our service mailing list, unless you give us permission to use it in other manners.<br />
<br />
Cookie/Tracking Technology<br />
This website may use cookie and tracking technology depending on the features offered. Cookie and tracking technology are useful for gathering information such as browser type and operating system, tracking the number of visitors to the website, and understanding how visitors use the website. Cookies can also help customize the website for visitors. Personal information cannot be collected via cookies and other tracking technology, however, if you previously provided personally identifiable information, cookies may be tied to such information. Aggregate cookie and tracking information may be shared with third parties.<br />
<br />
Distribution of Information<br />
We may share information with governmental agencies or other companies assisting us in fraud prevention or investigation. We may do so when: (1) permitted or required by law; or, (2) trying to protect against or prevent actual or potential fraud or unauthorized transactions; or, (3) investigating fraud which has already taken place. The information is not provided to these companies for marketing purposes.<br />
<br />
Commitment to Data Security<br />
Your personally identifiable information is kept secure. Only authorized employees, agents and contractors (who have agreed to keep information secure and confidential) have access to this information. All emails and newsletters from this website allow you to opt out of further mailings.<br />
<br />
Privacy Contact Information<br />
If you have any questions, concerns, or comments about our privacy policy you may contact us using means provided on this website.<br />
<br />
We reserve the right to make changes to this policy. Any changes to this policy will be posted.</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=sciXplorer_talk:Community_Portal
sciXplorer talk:Community Portal
2011-08-01T19:16:34Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Wp:bollocks
Talk:Wp:bollocks
2011-06-17T20:19:02Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Allpages
MediaWiki talk:Allpages
2011-06-01T20:41:25Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php
Talk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php
2011-05-05T16:16:37Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Wiki/wiki/index.php/Talk:Wiki/wiki/index.php/Talk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php%3Ftitle%3DTalk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php
Talk:Wiki/wiki/index.php/Talk:Wiki/wiki/index.php/Talk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php
2011-05-05T16:15:27Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php
Talk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php
2011-04-08T02:21:40Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php/Talk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php%3Ftitle%3DTalk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php
Talk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php/Talk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Wiki/wiki/wiki/index.php
2011-03-30T22:38:43Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Wantedpages
MediaWiki talk:Wantedpages
2011-02-01T19:16:01Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Wp:bollocks
Wp:bollocks
2011-01-09T05:34:21Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:WP:BOLLOCKS
Talk:WP:BOLLOCKS
2010-12-01T14:42:49Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Views
MediaWiki talk:Views
2010-11-24T21:40:35Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Exif-usercomment
MediaWiki talk:Exif-usercomment
2010-11-19T15:46:05Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=WP:BOLLOCKS
WP:BOLLOCKS
2010-11-17T16:20:11Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=WP:BOLLOCKS
WP:BOLLOCKS
2010-11-16T15:24:46Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template_talk:Unsigned
Template talk:Unsigned
2010-11-08T03:06:28Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Wiki/index.php
Talk:Wiki/index.php
2010-11-01T15:12:18Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=sciXplorer:Protected_page
sciXplorer:Protected page
2010-10-28T17:03:24Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:Unsigned
Template:Unsigned
2010-10-27T02:31:20Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Exif-usercomment
MediaWiki talk:Exif-usercomment
2010-10-26T14:23:33Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:New_York_Law_School
Talk:New York Law School
2010-10-26T14:23:11Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Wiki/wiki/index.php
Talk:Wiki/wiki/index.php
2010-10-25T02:38:30Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=New_York_Law_School
New York Law School
2010-10-25T02:38:00Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Wiki/wiki
Talk:Wiki/wiki
2010-10-24T13:42:04Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Huping_Hu
Huping Hu
2010-10-23T16:50:28Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''Huping Hu''', Ph.D., J.D., (born 1962) is a biophysicist and [[attorney]] in private practice. He is known in the small [[quantum mind]] circle for his proposal of a [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] with his collaborator Maoxin Wu. He is also somewhat known in the local Chinese community in [[Flushing, New York]] as a down-to-earth but courageous and tough attorney fighting for his clients' rights and interests.{{citation needed}}<br />
<br />
In 1985, he suggested in an article published in the little known Chinese magazine, Potential Science, that the [[entropy]] (thus, [[information]]) of any physical system based on the concept of "individual entropy" is conserved and intrinsically connected to the energy transformation and conservation law. This concept of entropy/information allows the existence of a "living" [[universe]] in which [[heat death]] due to the [[second law of thermodynamics]] could be avoided.<br />
<br />
In 2001, he proposed with his [[collaborator]] Maoxin Wu a novel mechanism of anesthetic action that says general [[anesthetic]]s produce [[unconsciousness]] by perturbing [[oxygen]] pathways in neural membranes and proteins. This view is not at all accepted by the [[scientific community]] at large. Indeed, there are no commonly accepted theory on how general anesthetics work, despite they have been in use for more than 150 years.{{citation needed}}<br />
<br />
The [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] was put forward by Huping Hu and his [[collaborator]] Maoxin Wu in 2002. Although published reviews, criticisms or comments on this theory are negligible to non-existent, it is well received at conferences and in private communications by some physicists and the like.{{citation needed}}<br />
<br />
He obtained his B.S. and M.S. from universities in [[China]] in 1983 and 1986 respectively. He then obtained his Ph.D. in [[biophysics]] from [[University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]] in 1991 and J.D. from New York Law School in 1998. He is admitted to practice law in the [[State of New York]] and the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York]] and the [[U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York]].<br />
<br />
==External links==<br />
*[http://www.quantumbrain.org Spin & Consciousness Research]<br />
*[http://www.lawyership.com Lawyership]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Living people|Hu, Huping]]<br />
[[Category:1962 births|Hu, Huping]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Huping_Hu
Huping Hu
2010-10-19T02:14:05Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''Huping Hu''', Ph.D., J.D., (born 1962) is a biophysicist and [[attorney]] in private practice. He is known in the small [[quantum mind]] circle for his proposal of a [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] with his collaborator Maoxin Wu. He is also somewhat known in the local Chinese community in [[Flushing, New York]] as a down-to-earth but courageous and tough attorney fighting for his clients' rights and interests.{{citation needed}}<br />
<br />
In 1985, he suggested in an article published in the little known Chinese magazine, Potential Science, that the [[entropy]] (thus, [[information]]) of any physical system based on the concept of "individual entropy" is conserved and intrinsically connected to the energy transformation and conservation law. This concept of entropy/information allows the existence of a "living" [[universe]] in which [[heat death]] due to the [[second law of thermodynamics]] could be avoided.<br />
<br />
In 2001, he proposed with his [[collaborator]] Maoxin Wu a novel mechanism of anesthetic action that says general [[anesthetic]]s produce [[unconsciousness]] by perturbing [[oxygen]] pathways in neural membranes and proteins. This view is not at all accepted by the [[scientific community]] at large. Indeed, there are no commonly accepted theory on how general anesthetics work, despite they have been in use for more than 150 years.{{citation needed}}<br />
<br />
The [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] was put forward by Huping Hu and his [[collaborator]] Maoxin Wu in 2002. Although published reviews, criticisms or comments on this theory are negligible to non-existent, it is well received at conferences and in private communications by some physicists and the like.{{citation needed}}<br />
<br />
He obtained his B.S. and M.S. from universities in [[China]] in 1983 and 1986 respectively. He then obtained his Ph.D. in [[biophysics]] from [[University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]] in 1991 and J.D. from [[New York Law School]] in 1998. He is admitted to practice law in the [[State of New York]] and the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York]] and the [[U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York]].<br />
<br />
==External links==<br />
*[http://www.quantumbrain.org Spin & Consciousness Research]<br />
*[http://www.lawyership.com Lawyership]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Living people|Hu, Huping]]<br />
[[Category:1962 births|Hu, Huping]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Spin-Mediated_Consciousness_Theory
Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory
2010-10-19T02:13:42Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>The '''spin-mediated consciousness theory''' is a theory that says [[quantum spin]] is the seat of [[consciousness]] and the linchpin between [[mind]] and the [[brain]], that is, spin is the [[mind-pixel]]. According to this theory, [[consciousness]] is intrinsically connected to the spin process and emerges from the collective dynamics of spin states and the unity of [[mind]] is achieved by [[quantum entanglement]] of these mind-pixels. <br />
<br />
This theory was initially proposed by biophysicist [[Huping Hu]] with his collaborator Maoxin Wu. It is a tentative hypothesis as are all current hypotheses about [[consciousness]]. The starting point is the fact that spin is basic quantum bit ("[[qubit]]") for encoding information and, on the other hand, neural [[membrane]]s and [[proteins]] are saturated with [[nuclear spin]] carrying nuclei and form the matrix of brain electrical activities. Indeed, spin is embedded in the microscopic structure of [[spacetime]] as reflected by [[Dirac equation]] and is likely more fundamental than spacetime itself as implicated by [[Roger Penrose]]’s work. In the [[David Hestenes]] picture the [[zitterbewegung]] associated with spin was shown to be responsible for the quantum effects of the [[fermion]]. Further, in the [[David Bohm]] picture the [[internal motion]] associated with spin has been shown to be responsible for the quantum potential which, in turn, is responsible for quantum effects. Thus, if one adopts the minority [[quantum mind]] view, nuclear spins and possibly unpaired [[electron spin]]s become natural candidates for mind-pixels. <br />
<br />
Applying these ideas to the particular structures and dynamics of the brain, they theorize that human brain works as follows: Through [[action potential]] modulated nuclear spin interactions and paramagnetic O2/NO driven activations, the nuclear spins inside neural membranes and proteins form various entangled quantum states the dynamics of which produces consciousness and have effects through spin chemistry on classical neural activities thus influencing the [[neural network]]s of the brain.<br />
<br />
As with other [[quantum mind]] theories, [[decoherence]] is a major concern as pointed out by [[Max Tegmark]] but may not be insurmountable. They suggest that the solutions to the decoherence challenge lie with [[quantum entanglement]].<br />
<br />
Experimentally, they recently contemplated from the perspective of their theory on the possibility of entangling the quantum entities inside the brain with those in an external anaesthetic sample and carried out experiments toward that end. They reported that applying magnetic pulses to the brain when a general anaesthetic sample was placed in between caused the brain to feel the effect of said anaesthetic for several hours after the treatment as if the test subject had actually inhaled the same. The brain effect was said to be consistently reproducible. Further, they claims that they have verified that the said brain effect was the consequence of [[quantum entanglement]] between [[quantum]] entities inside the brain and those of the chemical substance under study induced by the photons of the magnetic pulses or applied lights. They suggest that the said quantum entities inside the [[brain]] are likely nuclear or electronic spins which, if further verified, will provide experimental support to their theory.<br />
<br />
==See also==<br />
* [[Consciousness]]<br />
* [[Quantum mind]]<br />
* [[Orch-OR]]<br />
* [[Space-time theories of consciousness]]<br />
* [[Electromagnetic theories of consciousness]]<br />
* [http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Consciousness_studies Wikibook on consciousness]<br />
<br />
==References==<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2006)[http://ptep-online.com/index_files/2006/PP-06-04.PDF "Nonlocal effects of chemical substances on the brain produced through quantum entanglement"] Progress in Physics v3: 20-26.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2006)[http://www.neuroquantology.com/journal/index.php/nq/issue/view/28/showToc "Photon induced non-local effect of general anesthetics on the brain"] NeuroQuantology 4: 17-31.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2006)[http://www.neuroquantology.com/journal/index.php/nq/issue/view/28/showToc "Thinking outside the box: the essence and implications of quantum entanglement"] NeuroQuantology 4: 5-16.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M,(2004)[http://www.neuroquantology.com/journal/index.php/nq/issue/view/24/showToc "Action potential modulation of neural spin networks suggests possible role of spin in memory and consciousness"] NeuroQuantology 2: 309-317.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2004)[http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/623059/description "Spin-mediated consciousness theory: possible roles of neural membrane nuclear spin ensembles and paramagnetic oxygen"] Medical Hypotheses, 63: 633-646.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2004)[http://www.neuroquantology.com/journal/index.php/nq/issue/view/21 "Spin as primordial self-referential process driving quantum mechanics, spacetime dynamics and consciousness"] NeuroQuantology 2: 41-49.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2002)[http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0208068v1 "Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory: Possible Roles of Oxygen Unpaired Electronic Spins and Neural Membrane Nuclear Spin Ensemble in Memory and Consciousness"]arXiv:quant-ph/020868.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2001)[http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/623059/description "Mechanism of anesthetic action: oxygen pathway perturbation hypothesis"] Medical Hypotheses 57: 619-627 arXiv:physics/0101083<br />
<br />
==External links==<br />
*[http://www.quantumbrain.org Spin & Consciousness Research]<br />
*[http://www.neuroquantology.com/journal/index.php/nq/issue/view/28 Spin & Consciousness Theory, NeuroQuantology March 2006 Special Issue]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Consciousness studies]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page
Talk:Main Page
2010-10-14T13:44:13Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Faqpage
MediaWiki talk:Faqpage
2010-10-13T13:49:00Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page
Talk:Main Page
2010-10-13T13:47:28Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
Main Page
2010-03-07T17:23:39Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>Welcome to sciXplorer - an evolving science encyclopedia.<br />
<br />
Items Available:<br />
<br><br />
[[Huping Hu]]<br />
<br><br />
[[Mind-Pixel]]<br />
<br><br />
[[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Wiki/wiki
Wiki/wiki
2010-03-07T17:22:32Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div></div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Mind-Pixel
Mind-Pixel
2010-03-07T17:14:02Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>Mind-pixel is a term coined by biophysicist [[Huping Hu]] in 2002 to describe the elementary functional unit of mind from the reductionist's perspective. It has similar meaning as the better known term neural substrate of consciousness.</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
Main Page
2010-03-07T17:12:48Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>Welcome to sciXplorer - an evolving science encyclopedia.<br />
<br />
Items Available:<br />
<br><br />
[[Huping Hu]]<br />
<br><br />
[[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]]<br />
<br><br />
[[Mind-Pixel]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Spin-Mediated_Consciousness_Theory
Talk:Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory
2006-10-11T01:52:40Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>This item was rescued from Wikipedia on October 10, 2006. According to Wikipedia's deletion discussion page, the reasons for vote of deletion were as follows:<br />
<br />
This is a [[WP:BOLLOCKS|bollocks]]-ridden "[[WP:FT|fringe theory]]". It has not been published in any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] &mdash; both journals from which the article is sourced are decidedly cranky (''Medical Hypotheses'' particularly: they will publish anything, quite literally, as long as the author pays per page [http://www.elsevier-international.com/journals/mehy/]). It also fails [[WP:NOT|notability]] policies, since no real assertion of notability is made. And it arguably is [[WP:OR|original research]] as well. Moreover, Wikipedia does not need to be a platform for the promotion of utterly misleading drivel. <br />
<br />
Was prodded yesterday by someone else, but the tag was removed by an IP/anon with no explanation.[[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 14:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
'''Update''' The creator's apparent vanity piece has also been nominated for deletion, [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Huping_Hu|here]]. [[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 17:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' as a violation of all the policies mentioned in the nomination. I suspect this article violates [[WP:VAIN]] as well: it was created by an IP, {{user|24.185.23.19}}, who also edited [[New York Law School]] last April. According to [[Huping Hu]] (the article on the inventor of this "theory"), Hu attended that school in the 1990s. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 17:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom and Anville. Note that this was deleted in November 2004, which looks to be before the deletion log started, but see [[Special:Undelete/Spin-Mediated_Consciousness_Theory]] and [[Wikipedia:Requests for investigation/Archives/2004/11#70.19.54.226|request for investigation]] about the same IP. I've left a note for [[user:Ancheta Wis]], who seems to be the one requesting deletion back then and appears to still be active. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 19:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
**Good detective work. The first link you posted only works for admins, it appears, but the discovery is nonetheless interesting. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 19:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
***Yes, Special:Undelete is an admin-only page. I should have noted that, sorry. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 20:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
**From the [[Wikipedia:Deletion log|old manual deletion log]]:<br />
***15:16, 26 Nov 2004 [[User:DropDeadGorgias|DropDeadGorgias]] deleted [[:Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]]<br />
** [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 20:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] 20:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom, especially [[WP:BOLLOCKS]]. --[[User:Pjacobi|Pjacobi]] 21:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' per Huping Hu. This piece was initially written by me when Wikipedia was in its infant stage back in 2004 as a way to introduce our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] because someone cited our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] in the [[Consciousness]] and, I believe, [[quantum mind]] entry. Please be advised that [[User:Anville|Anville]]'s statement with respect to spamming is factually false and, upon information and belief, libelous. Our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] speaks for itself and if it was added or edited within [[quantum mind]] and [[spin]] the purpose was related to relevancy not vanity. May GOD bless Wikipedia and its participants so that it may stay useful, innovative, diverse and informative. {{unsigned|72.89.197.56}}<br />
:Looks like you are claiming that you are Huping Hu and also that you are the author of the two articles. Is that correct? If so I add [[WP:NPOV]] to my vote. And {{user|72.89.197.56}}, please review [[WP:NLT]] and note that making legal threats in the Wikipedia is gravely frowned upon.---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 23:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' as per [[WP:BOLLOCKS]]. This article reads like pure pseudoscientific newagery; there is a bit about (poorly described) physical background but no indication of how spin states are supposed to generate conciouness, so the article completely fails in its mission of even describing the alleged "theory". NeuroQuantology?!! Is this yet another crankjournal? Sheesh! Can we consolidate this AfD with the biography? I agree with [[User:Anville]] that even a cursory examination raises the issue of [[WP:VAIN]]. ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 22:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
::We had an article on ''NeuroQuantology'' at some point, but it met a justly deserved fate (PRODed, I believe, not AfD). A [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=neuroquantology Google Scholar search] on that journal was quite illuminating, as was a perusal of its website. . . but that's not really a topic germane to this discussion. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 23:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' No evidence of notability.[[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per above. [[User:Linas|linas]] 04:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*Keep!* No current theory of consciousness will be the correct one. Or even close to the correct one. They will all verge on scientism. But, based upon this article in Wikipedia, this Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory (SMCT) looks like the best one we've got so far. Please don't discourage serious attempts at the hard problem of consciousness by immediately deleting every theory which is proposed! {{unsigned|68.81.66.41}} {{spa|68.81.66.41}}<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' No evidence of notability; the theory is a [[WP:BOLLOCKS|bollocks]]-ridden [[WP:FT|fringe theory]] whose main claim to fame is appearing in this Wikipedia article. [[User:John Baez|John Baez]] 04:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Discussion on Wikipedia as of October 10, 2006:<br />
<br />
Woudn't VfD be more apropriate than Speedy? Unless this is a copyvio, does anybody have a link? [[User:Sander123|Sander123]] 15:07, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Looks to me like a random crackpot theory. Though by what sounds like a real scientist. Should probably be left up but with a warning - tentative random ramblings of a biologist, don't give any serious belief to.<br />
<br />
This is idiocy. What difference does it make if it is "random" or whether or not you agree with it? Somebody proposed it, so it exists. Wikipedia is simply a record of knowledge, and part of that knowledge concerns what is proposed by people as theories, whether or not some people consider them to be "crackpot" or not. Why don't you delete the article on phlogiston then, or on Ptolemaic astronomy, or anything else that turned out to be utter non-sense? (and, no, I am not saying this particular theory is utter non-sense). Pretending it doesn't exist does not make it go away. Tag removed.[[User:Sayfadeen|Sayfadeen]]<br />
<br />
:Wikipedia is not a record of every crackpot theory. See the [[WP:NOR]] policy. [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] 20:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Touche. So why not just say: "This violates the NOR policy" rather than "This is a crack-pot theory." The first is a valid reason for deletion, the second is just baiting and insult. [[User:Sayfadeen|Sayfadeen]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Spin-Mediated_Consciousness_Theory
Talk:Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory
2006-10-11T01:49:55Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>This item was rescued from Wikipedia on October 10, 2006. According to Wikipedia's deletion discussion page, the reasons for vote of deletion were as follows:<br />
<br />
This is a [[WP:BOLLOCKS|bollocks]]-ridden "[[WP:FT|fringe theory]]". It has not been published in any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] &mdash; both journals from which the article is sourced are decidedly cranky (''Medical Hypotheses'' particularly: they will publish anything, quite literally, as long as the author pays per page [http://www.elsevier-international.com/journals/mehy/]). It also fails [[WP:NOT|notability]] policies, since no real assertion of notability is made. And it arguably is [[WP:OR|original research]] as well. Moreover, Wikipedia does not need to be a platform for the promotion of utterly misleading drivel. <br />
<br />
Was prodded yesterday by someone else, but the tag was removed by an IP/anon with no explanation.[[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 14:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
'''Update''' The creator's apparent vanity piece has also been nominated for deletion, [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Huping_Hu|here]]. [[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 17:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' as a violation of all the policies mentioned in the nomination. I suspect this article violates [[WP:VAIN]] as well: it was created by an IP, {{user|24.185.23.19}}, who also edited [[New York Law School]] last April. According to [[Huping Hu]] (the article on the inventor of this "theory"), Hu attended that school in the 1990s. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 17:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom and Anville. Note that this was deleted in November 2004, which looks to be before the deletion log started, but see [[Special:Undelete/Spin-Mediated_Consciousness_Theory]] and [[Wikipedia:Requests for investigation/Archives/2004/11#70.19.54.226|request for investigation]] about the same IP. I've left a note for [[user:Ancheta Wis]], who seems to be the one requesting deletion back then and appears to still be active. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 19:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
**Good detective work. The first link you posted only works for admins, it appears, but the discovery is nonetheless interesting. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 19:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
***Yes, Special:Undelete is an admin-only page. I should have noted that, sorry. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 20:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
**From the [[Wikipedia:Deletion log|old manual deletion log]]:<br />
***15:16, 26 Nov 2004 [[User:DropDeadGorgias|DropDeadGorgias]] deleted [[:Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]]<br />
** [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 20:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] 20:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom, especially [[WP:BOLLOCKS]]. --[[User:Pjacobi|Pjacobi]] 21:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' per Huping Hu. This piece was initially written by me when Wikipedia was in its infant stage back in 2004 as a way to introduce our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] because someone cited our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] in the [[Consciousness]] and, I believe, [[quantum mind]] entry. Please be advised that [[User:Anville|Anville]]'s statement with respect to spamming is factually false and, upon information and belief, libelous. Our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] speaks for itself and if it was added or edited within [[quantum mind]] and [[spin]] the purpose was related to relevancy not vanity. May GOD bless Wikipedia and its participants so that it may stay useful, innovative, diverse and informative. {{unsigned|72.89.197.56}}<br />
:Looks like you are claiming that you are Huping Hu and also that you are the author of the two articles. Is that correct? If so I add [[WP:NPOV]] to my vote. And {{user|72.89.197.56}}, please review [[WP:NLT]] and note that making legal threats in the Wikipedia is gravely frowned upon.---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 23:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' as per [[WP:BOLLOCKS]]. This article reads like pure pseudoscientific newagery; there is a bit about (poorly described) physical background but no indication of how spin states are supposed to generate conciouness, so the article completely fails in its mission of even describing the alleged "theory". NeuroQuantology?!! Is this yet another crankjournal? Sheesh! Can we consolidate this AfD with the biography? I agree with [[User:Anville]] that even a cursory examination raises the issue of [[WP:VAIN]]. ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 22:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
::We had an article on ''NeuroQuantology'' at some point, but it met a justly deserved fate (PRODed, I believe, not AfD). A [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=neuroquantology Google Scholar search] on that journal was quite illuminating, as was a perusal of its website. . . but that's not really a topic germane to this discussion. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 23:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' No evidence of notability.[[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per above. [[User:Linas|linas]] 04:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*Keep!* No current theory of consciousness will be the correct one. Or even close to the correct one. They will all verge on scientism. But, based upon this article in Wikipedia, this Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory (SMCT) looks like the best one we've got so far. Please don't discourage serious attempts at the hard problem of consciousness by immediately deleting every theory which is proposed! {{unsigned|68.81.66.41}} {{spa|68.81.66.41}}<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' No evidence of notability; the theory is a [[WP:BOLLOCKS|bollocks]]-ridden [[WP:FT|fringe theory]] whose main claim to fame is appearing in this Wikipedia article. [[User:John Baez|John Baez]] 04:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Discussion on Wikipeida as of October 10, 2006:<br />
<br />
Woudn't VfD be more apropriate than Speedy? Unless this is a copyvio, does anybody have a link? [[User:Sander123|Sander123]] 15:07, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Looks to me like a random crackpot theory. Though by what sounds like a real scientist. Should probably be left up but with a warning - tentative random ramblings of a biologist, don't give any serious belief to.<br />
<br />
This is idiocy. What difference does it make if it is "random" or whether or not you agree with it? Somebody proposed it, so it exists. Wikipedia is simply a record of knowledge, and part of that knowledge concerns what is proposed by people as theories, whether or not some people consider them to be "crackpot" or not. Why don't you delete the article on phlogiston then, or on Ptolemaic astronomy, or anything else that turned out to be utter non-sense? (and, no, I am not saying this particular theory is utter non-sense). Pretending it doesn't exist does not make it go away. Tag removed.[[User:Sayfadeen|Sayfadeen]]<br />
<br />
:Wikipedia is not a record of every crackpot theory. See the [[WP:NOR]] policy. [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] 20:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Touche. So why not just say: "This violates the NOR policy" rather than "This is a crack-pot theory." The first is a valid reason for deletion, the second is just baiting and insult. [[User:Sayfadeen|Sayfadeen]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Huping_Hu
Talk:Huping Hu
2006-10-11T01:43:24Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>This item was rescued from Wikipedia on October 10, 2006. According to Wikipedia's deletion discussion page, the reasons for vote of deletion were as follows:<br />
<br />
Biography of a "[[biophysicist]] and [[attorney]] in private practice". Liberally seasoned with "citation needed" tags, this article fails to satisfy the [[Wikipedia:Notability (academics)]] proposal (not to mention notability practice in general) and is almost certainly a [[WP:VAIN|vanity piece]]. The anon IP who created it, {{user|24.185.23.19}}, also edited [[New York Law School]], which Hu apparently attended, as well as spamming [[Consciousness]], [[Spin]] and [[Quantum mind]] with Hu's [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] (currently also [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory|up for deletion]]). [[User:Anville|Anville]] 17:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. Good work rooting him out. [[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 17:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
* '''Delete''' as non-notable. [[User:Deli nk|Deli nk]] 18:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 18:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] 20:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per Huping Hu. This piece was initially written by me when Wikipedia was in its infant stage back in 2004 as a way to introduce our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] and its originator, me, because someone cited our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] in the [[Consciousness]] and, I believe, [[quantum mind]] entry. Of course, I'm not notable and vanity is last thing I have in mind. I'm perfect happy with my life and work without any entry to Wikipedia. Please be advised that [[User:Anville|Anville]]'s statement with respect to spamming is factually false and, upon information and belief, libelous. Our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] speaks for itself and if it was added or edited within [[quantum mind]] and [[spin]] the purpose was related to relevancy not vanity. May GOD bless Wikipedia and its participants so that it may stay useful, innovative, diverse and informative. {{unsigned|72.89.197.56}}<br />
:Warning: your statement ''"Please be advised that Anville's statement with respect to spamming is factually false and, upon information and belief, libelous"'' is in clear violation of [[WP:NLT]]. ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 23:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
:Some evidence that our anon is indeed Huping Hu:<br />
:The ''dyn.optonline.net anon'' used {{user|24.185.23.19}} from 27 November 2004 to 12 April 2005; geolocated [[Brooklyn, NY]]<br />
:The ''nycmny.east.verizon.net anon'' used {{user|72.89.197.56}} which is so far a single use account; apparently geolocated in [[NYC]] area; note that [[East Village, Manhattan]] is near [[NYU]].<br />
:Make of this what you will.---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 23:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. Seems to be a clear case of [[WP:VAIN]]. Good work, Anville, Thryduulf, and UncleG! ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 23:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' [[User:Linas|linas]] 04:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Huping_Hu
Talk:Huping Hu
2006-10-11T01:42:45Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div><br />
Biography of a "[[biophysicist]] and [[attorney]] in private practice". Liberally seasoned with "citation needed" tags, this article fails to satisfy the [[Wikipedia:Notability (academics)]] proposal (not to mention notability practice in general) and is almost certainly a [[WP:VAIN|vanity piece]]. The anon IP who created it, {{user|24.185.23.19}}, also edited [[New York Law School]], which Hu apparently attended, as well as spamming [[Consciousness]], [[Spin]] and [[Quantum mind]] with Hu's [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] (currently also [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory|up for deletion]]). [[User:Anville|Anville]] 17:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. Good work rooting him out. [[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 17:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
* '''Delete''' as non-notable. [[User:Deli nk|Deli nk]] 18:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 18:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] 20:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per Huping Hu. This piece was initially written by me when Wikipedia was in its infant stage back in 2004 as a way to introduce our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] and its originator, me, because someone cited our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] in the [[Consciousness]] and, I believe, [[quantum mind]] entry. Of course, I'm not notable and vanity is last thing I have in mind. I'm perfect happy with my life and work without any entry to Wikipedia. Please be advised that [[User:Anville|Anville]]'s statement with respect to spamming is factually false and, upon information and belief, libelous. Our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] speaks for itself and if it was added or edited within [[quantum mind]] and [[spin]] the purpose was related to relevancy not vanity. May GOD bless Wikipedia and its participants so that it may stay useful, innovative, diverse and informative. {{unsigned|72.89.197.56}}<br />
:Warning: your statement ''"Please be advised that Anville's statement with respect to spamming is factually false and, upon information and belief, libelous"'' is in clear violation of [[WP:NLT]]. ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 23:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
:Some evidence that our anon is indeed Huping Hu:<br />
:The ''dyn.optonline.net anon'' used {{user|24.185.23.19}} from 27 November 2004 to 12 April 2005; geolocated [[Brooklyn, NY]]<br />
:The ''nycmny.east.verizon.net anon'' used {{user|72.89.197.56}} which is so far a single use account; apparently geolocated in [[NYC]] area; note that [[East Village, Manhattan]] is near [[NYU]].<br />
:Make of this what you will.---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 23:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. Seems to be a clear case of [[WP:VAIN]]. Good work, Anville, Thryduulf, and UncleG! ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 23:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' [[User:Linas|linas]] 04:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Spin-Mediated_Consciousness_Theory
Talk:Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory
2006-10-11T01:40:49Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>This item was rescued from Wikipedia on October 10, 2006. According to Wikipedia's deletion discussion page, the reasons for vote of deletion were as follows:<br />
<br />
This is a [[WP:BOLLOCKS|bollocks]]-ridden "[[WP:FT|fringe theory]]". It has not been published in any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] &mdash; both journals from which the article is sourced are decidedly cranky (''Medical Hypotheses'' particularly: they will publish anything, quite literally, as long as the author pays per page [http://www.elsevier-international.com/journals/mehy/]). It also fails [[WP:NOT|notability]] policies, since no real assertion of notability is made. And it arguably is [[WP:OR|original research]] as well. Moreover, Wikipedia does not need to be a platform for the promotion of utterly misleading drivel. <br />
<br />
Was prodded yesterday by someone else, but the tag was removed by an IP/anon with no explanation.[[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 14:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
'''Update''' The creator's apparent vanity piece has also been nominated for deletion, [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Huping_Hu|here]]. [[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 17:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' as a violation of all the policies mentioned in the nomination. I suspect this article violates [[WP:VAIN]] as well: it was created by an IP, {{user|24.185.23.19}}, who also edited [[New York Law School]] last April. According to [[Huping Hu]] (the article on the inventor of this "theory"), Hu attended that school in the 1990s. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 17:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom and Anville. Note that this was deleted in November 2004, which looks to be before the deletion log started, but see [[Special:Undelete/Spin-Mediated_Consciousness_Theory]] and [[Wikipedia:Requests for investigation/Archives/2004/11#70.19.54.226|request for investigation]] about the same IP. I've left a note for [[user:Ancheta Wis]], who seems to be the one requesting deletion back then and appears to still be active. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 19:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
**Good detective work. The first link you posted only works for admins, it appears, but the discovery is nonetheless interesting. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 19:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
***Yes, Special:Undelete is an admin-only page. I should have noted that, sorry. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 20:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
**From the [[Wikipedia:Deletion log|old manual deletion log]]:<br />
***15:16, 26 Nov 2004 [[User:DropDeadGorgias|DropDeadGorgias]] deleted [[:Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]]<br />
** [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 20:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] 20:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom, especially [[WP:BOLLOCKS]]. --[[User:Pjacobi|Pjacobi]] 21:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' per Huping Hu. This piece was initially written by me when Wikipedia was in its infant stage back in 2004 as a way to introduce our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] because someone cited our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] in the [[Consciousness]] and, I believe, [[quantum mind]] entry. Please be advised that [[User:Anville|Anville]]'s statement with respect to spamming is factually false and, upon information and belief, libelous. Our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] speaks for itself and if it was added or edited within [[quantum mind]] and [[spin]] the purpose was related to relevancy not vanity. May GOD bless Wikipedia and its participants so that it may stay useful, innovative, diverse and informative. {{unsigned|72.89.197.56}}<br />
:Looks like you are claiming that you are Huping Hu and also that you are the author of the two articles. Is that correct? If so I add [[WP:NPOV]] to my vote. And {{user|72.89.197.56}}, please review [[WP:NLT]] and note that making legal threats in the Wikipedia is gravely frowned upon.---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 23:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' as per [[WP:BOLLOCKS]]. This article reads like pure pseudoscientific newagery; there is a bit about (poorly described) physical background but no indication of how spin states are supposed to generate conciouness, so the article completely fails in its mission of even describing the alleged "theory". NeuroQuantology?!! Is this yet another crankjournal? Sheesh! Can we consolidate this AfD with the biography? I agree with [[User:Anville]] that even a cursory examination raises the issue of [[WP:VAIN]]. ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 22:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
::We had an article on ''NeuroQuantology'' at some point, but it met a justly deserved fate (PRODed, I believe, not AfD). A [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=neuroquantology Google Scholar search] on that journal was quite illuminating, as was a perusal of its website. . . but that's not really a topic germane to this discussion. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 23:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' No evidence of notability.[[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per above. [[User:Linas|linas]] 04:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*Keep!* No current theory of consciousness will be the correct one. Or even close to the correct one. They will all verge on scientism. But, based upon this article in Wikipedia, this Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory (SMCT) looks like the best one we've got so far. Please don't discourage serious attempts at the hard problem of consciousness by immediately deleting every theory which is proposed! {{unsigned|68.81.66.41}} {{spa|68.81.66.41}}<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' No evidence of notability; the theory is a [[WP:BOLLOCKS|bollocks]]-ridden [[WP:FT|fringe theory]] whose main claim to fame is appearing in this Wikipedia article. [[User:John Baez|John Baez]] 04:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Spin-Mediated_Consciousness_Theory
Talk:Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory
2006-10-11T01:40:07Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>This item was rescued from Wikipedia on October 10, 2006 before deletion. According to Wikipedia's deletion discussion page, the reasons for vote of deletion were as follows:<br />
<br />
This is a [[WP:BOLLOCKS|bollocks]]-ridden "[[WP:FT|fringe theory]]". It has not been published in any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] &mdash; both journals from which the article is sourced are decidedly cranky (''Medical Hypotheses'' particularly: they will publish anything, quite literally, as long as the author pays per page [http://www.elsevier-international.com/journals/mehy/]). It also fails [[WP:NOT|notability]] policies, since no real assertion of notability is made. And it arguably is [[WP:OR|original research]] as well. Moreover, Wikipedia does not need to be a platform for the promotion of utterly misleading drivel. <br />
<br />
Was prodded yesterday by someone else, but the tag was removed by an IP/anon with no explanation.[[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 14:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
'''Update''' The creator's apparent vanity piece has also been nominated for deletion, [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Huping_Hu|here]]. [[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 17:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' as a violation of all the policies mentioned in the nomination. I suspect this article violates [[WP:VAIN]] as well: it was created by an IP, {{user|24.185.23.19}}, who also edited [[New York Law School]] last April. According to [[Huping Hu]] (the article on the inventor of this "theory"), Hu attended that school in the 1990s. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 17:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom and Anville. Note that this was deleted in November 2004, which looks to be before the deletion log started, but see [[Special:Undelete/Spin-Mediated_Consciousness_Theory]] and [[Wikipedia:Requests for investigation/Archives/2004/11#70.19.54.226|request for investigation]] about the same IP. I've left a note for [[user:Ancheta Wis]], who seems to be the one requesting deletion back then and appears to still be active. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 19:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
**Good detective work. The first link you posted only works for admins, it appears, but the discovery is nonetheless interesting. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 19:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
***Yes, Special:Undelete is an admin-only page. I should have noted that, sorry. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 20:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
**From the [[Wikipedia:Deletion log|old manual deletion log]]:<br />
***15:16, 26 Nov 2004 [[User:DropDeadGorgias|DropDeadGorgias]] deleted [[:Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]]<br />
** [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 20:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] 20:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom, especially [[WP:BOLLOCKS]]. --[[User:Pjacobi|Pjacobi]] 21:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' per Huping Hu. This piece was initially written by me when Wikipedia was in its infant stage back in 2004 as a way to introduce our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] because someone cited our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] in the [[Consciousness]] and, I believe, [[quantum mind]] entry. Please be advised that [[User:Anville|Anville]]'s statement with respect to spamming is factually false and, upon information and belief, libelous. Our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] speaks for itself and if it was added or edited within [[quantum mind]] and [[spin]] the purpose was related to relevancy not vanity. May GOD bless Wikipedia and its participants so that it may stay useful, innovative, diverse and informative. {{unsigned|72.89.197.56}}<br />
:Looks like you are claiming that you are Huping Hu and also that you are the author of the two articles. Is that correct? If so I add [[WP:NPOV]] to my vote. And {{user|72.89.197.56}}, please review [[WP:NLT]] and note that making legal threats in the Wikipedia is gravely frowned upon.---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 23:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' as per [[WP:BOLLOCKS]]. This article reads like pure pseudoscientific newagery; there is a bit about (poorly described) physical background but no indication of how spin states are supposed to generate conciouness, so the article completely fails in its mission of even describing the alleged "theory". NeuroQuantology?!! Is this yet another crankjournal? Sheesh! Can we consolidate this AfD with the biography? I agree with [[User:Anville]] that even a cursory examination raises the issue of [[WP:VAIN]]. ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 22:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
::We had an article on ''NeuroQuantology'' at some point, but it met a justly deserved fate (PRODed, I believe, not AfD). A [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=neuroquantology Google Scholar search] on that journal was quite illuminating, as was a perusal of its website. . . but that's not really a topic germane to this discussion. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 23:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' No evidence of notability.[[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per above. [[User:Linas|linas]] 04:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*Keep!* No current theory of consciousness will be the correct one. Or even close to the correct one. They will all verge on scientism. But, based upon this article in Wikipedia, this Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory (SMCT) looks like the best one we've got so far. Please don't discourage serious attempts at the hard problem of consciousness by immediately deleting every theory which is proposed! {{unsigned|68.81.66.41}} {{spa|68.81.66.41}}<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' No evidence of notability; the theory is a [[WP:BOLLOCKS|bollocks]]-ridden [[WP:FT|fringe theory]] whose main claim to fame is appearing in this Wikipedia article. [[User:John Baez|John Baez]] 04:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Spin-Mediated_Consciousness_Theory
Talk:Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory
2006-10-11T01:38:47Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>This item was rescued from Wikipedia on October 10, 2006 before deletion. The reason for deletion was as follows according to Wikipedia's deletion discussion page:<br />
<br />
This is a [[WP:BOLLOCKS|bollocks]]-ridden "[[WP:FT|fringe theory]]". It has not been published in any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] &mdash; both journals from which the article is sourced are decidedly cranky (''Medical Hypotheses'' particularly: they will publish anything, quite literally, as long as the author pays per page [http://www.elsevier-international.com/journals/mehy/]). It also fails [[WP:NOT|notability]] policies, since no real assertion of notability is made. And it arguably is [[WP:OR|original research]] as well. Moreover, Wikipedia does not need to be a platform for the promotion of utterly misleading drivel. <br />
<br />
Was prodded yesterday by someone else, but the tag was removed by an IP/anon with no explanation.[[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 14:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
'''Update''' The creator's apparent vanity piece has also been nominated for deletion, [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Huping_Hu|here]]. [[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 17:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' as a violation of all the policies mentioned in the nomination. I suspect this article violates [[WP:VAIN]] as well: it was created by an IP, {{user|24.185.23.19}}, who also edited [[New York Law School]] last April. According to [[Huping Hu]] (the article on the inventor of this "theory"), Hu attended that school in the 1990s. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 17:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom and Anville. Note that this was deleted in November 2004, which looks to be before the deletion log started, but see [[Special:Undelete/Spin-Mediated_Consciousness_Theory]] and [[Wikipedia:Requests for investigation/Archives/2004/11#70.19.54.226|request for investigation]] about the same IP. I've left a note for [[user:Ancheta Wis]], who seems to be the one requesting deletion back then and appears to still be active. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 19:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
**Good detective work. The first link you posted only works for admins, it appears, but the discovery is nonetheless interesting. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 19:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
***Yes, Special:Undelete is an admin-only page. I should have noted that, sorry. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 20:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
**From the [[Wikipedia:Deletion log|old manual deletion log]]:<br />
***15:16, 26 Nov 2004 [[User:DropDeadGorgias|DropDeadGorgias]] deleted [[:Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]]<br />
** [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 20:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] 20:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per nom, especially [[WP:BOLLOCKS]]. --[[User:Pjacobi|Pjacobi]] 21:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' per Huping Hu. This piece was initially written by me when Wikipedia was in its infant stage back in 2004 as a way to introduce our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] because someone cited our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] in the [[Consciousness]] and, I believe, [[quantum mind]] entry. Please be advised that [[User:Anville|Anville]]'s statement with respect to spamming is factually false and, upon information and belief, libelous. Our [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] speaks for itself and if it was added or edited within [[quantum mind]] and [[spin]] the purpose was related to relevancy not vanity. May GOD bless Wikipedia and its participants so that it may stay useful, innovative, diverse and informative. {{unsigned|72.89.197.56}}<br />
:Looks like you are claiming that you are Huping Hu and also that you are the author of the two articles. Is that correct? If so I add [[WP:NPOV]] to my vote. And {{user|72.89.197.56}}, please review [[WP:NLT]] and note that making legal threats in the Wikipedia is gravely frowned upon.---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 23:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' as per [[WP:BOLLOCKS]]. This article reads like pure pseudoscientific newagery; there is a bit about (poorly described) physical background but no indication of how spin states are supposed to generate conciouness, so the article completely fails in its mission of even describing the alleged "theory". NeuroQuantology?!! Is this yet another crankjournal? Sheesh! Can we consolidate this AfD with the biography? I agree with [[User:Anville]] that even a cursory examination raises the issue of [[WP:VAIN]]. ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 22:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
::We had an article on ''NeuroQuantology'' at some point, but it met a justly deserved fate (PRODed, I believe, not AfD). A [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=neuroquantology Google Scholar search] on that journal was quite illuminating, as was a perusal of its website. . . but that's not really a topic germane to this discussion. [[User:Anville|Anville]] 23:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' No evidence of notability.[[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
*'''Delete''' per above. [[User:Linas|linas]] 04:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)<br />
<br />
*Keep!* No current theory of consciousness will be the correct one. Or even close to the correct one. They will all verge on scientism. But, based upon this article in Wikipedia, this Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory (SMCT) looks like the best one we've got so far. Please don't discourage serious attempts at the hard problem of consciousness by immediately deleting every theory which is proposed! {{unsigned|68.81.66.41}} {{spa|68.81.66.41}}<br />
<br />
*'''Delete''' No evidence of notability; the theory is a [[WP:BOLLOCKS|bollocks]]-ridden [[WP:FT|fringe theory]] whose main claim to fame is appearing in this Wikipedia article. [[User:John Baez|John Baez]] 04:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
Main Page
2006-10-11T01:30:03Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>Welcome to sciXplorer - an evolving science encyclopedia.<br />
<br />
Items Available:<br />
<br><br />
[[Huping Hu]]<br />
<br><br />
[[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Spin-Mediated_Consciousness_Theory
Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory
2006-10-11T01:27:49Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>The '''spin-mediated consciousness theory''' is a theory that says [[quantum spin]] is the seat of [[consciousness]] and the linchpin between [[mind]] and the [[brain]], that is, spin is the [[mind-pixel]]. According to this theory, [[consciousness]] is intrinsically connected to the spin process and emerges from the collective dynamics of spin states and the unity of [[mind]] is achieved by [[quantum entanglement]] of these mind-pixels. <br />
<br />
This theory was initially proposed by [[biophysicist]] [[Huping Hu]] with his collaborator Maoxin Wu. It is a tentative hypothesis as are all current hypotheses about [[consciousness]]. The starting point is the fact that spin is basic quantum bit ("[[qubit]]") for encoding information and, on the other hand, neural [[membrane]]s and [[proteins]] are saturated with [[nuclear spin]] carrying nuclei and form the matrix of brain electrical activities. Indeed, spin is embedded in the microscopic structure of [[spacetime]] as reflected by [[Dirac equation]] and is likely more fundamental than spacetime itself as implicated by [[Roger Penrose]]’s work. In the [[David Hestenes]] picture the [[zitterbewegung]] associated with spin was shown to be responsible for the quantum effects of the [[fermion]]. Further, in the [[David Bohm]] picture the [[internal motion]] associated with spin has been shown to be responsible for the quantum potential which, in turn, is responsible for quantum effects. Thus, if one adopts the minority [[quantum mind]] view, nuclear spins and possibly unpaired [[electron spin]]s become natural candidates for mind-pixels. <br />
<br />
Applying these ideas to the particular structures and dynamics of the brain, they theorize that human brain works as follows: Through [[action potential]] modulated nuclear spin interactions and paramagnetic O2/NO driven activations, the nuclear spins inside neural membranes and proteins form various entangled quantum states the dynamics of which produces consciousness and have effects through spin chemistry on classical neural activities thus influencing the [[neural network]]s of the brain.<br />
<br />
As with other [[quantum mind]] theories, [[decoherence]] is a major concern as pointed out by [[Max Tegmark]] but may not be insurmountable. They suggest that the solutions to the decoherence challenge lie with [[quantum entanglement]].<br />
<br />
Experimentally, they recently contemplated from the perspective of their theory on the possibility of entangling the quantum entities inside the brain with those in an external anaesthetic sample and carried out experiments toward that end. They reported that applying magnetic pulses to the brain when a general anaesthetic sample was placed in between caused the brain to feel the effect of said anaesthetic for several hours after the treatment as if the test subject had actually inhaled the same. The brain effect was said to be consistently reproducible. Further, they claims that they have verified that the said brain effect was the consequence of [[quantum entanglement]] between [[quantum]] entities inside the brain and those of the chemical substance under study induced by the photons of the magnetic pulses or applied lights. They suggest that the said quantum entities inside the [[brain]] are likely nuclear or electronic spins which, if further verified, will provide experimental support to their theory.<br />
<br />
==See also==<br />
* [[Consciousness]]<br />
* [[Quantum mind]]<br />
* [[Orch-OR]]<br />
* [[Space-time theories of consciousness]]<br />
* [[Electromagnetic theories of consciousness]]<br />
* [http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Consciousness_studies Wikibook on consciousness]<br />
<br />
==References==<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2006)[http://ptep-online.com/index_files/2006/PP-06-04.PDF "Nonlocal effects of chemical substances on the brain produced through quantum entanglement"] Progress in Physics v3: 20-26.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2006)[http://www.neuroquantology.com/journal/index.php/nq/issue/view/28/showToc "Photon induced non-local effect of general anesthetics on the brain"] NeuroQuantology 4: 17-31.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2006)[http://www.neuroquantology.com/journal/index.php/nq/issue/view/28/showToc "Thinking outside the box: the essence and implications of quantum entanglement"] NeuroQuantology 4: 5-16.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M,(2004)[http://www.neuroquantology.com/journal/index.php/nq/issue/view/24/showToc "Action potential modulation of neural spin networks suggests possible role of spin in memory and consciousness"] NeuroQuantology 2: 309-317.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2004)[http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/623059/description "Spin-mediated consciousness theory: possible roles of neural membrane nuclear spin ensembles and paramagnetic oxygen"] Medical Hypotheses, 63: 633-646.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2004)[http://www.neuroquantology.com/journal/index.php/nq/issue/view/21 "Spin as primordial self-referential process driving quantum mechanics, spacetime dynamics and consciousness"] NeuroQuantology 2: 41-49.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2002)[http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0208068v1 "Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory: Possible Roles of Oxygen Unpaired Electronic Spins and Neural Membrane Nuclear Spin Ensemble in Memory and Consciousness"]arXiv:quant-ph/020868.<br />
*Hu,H & Wu, M, (2001)[http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/623059/description "Mechanism of anesthetic action: oxygen pathway perturbation hypothesis"] Medical Hypotheses 57: 619-627 arXiv:physics/0101083<br />
<br />
==External links==<br />
*[http://www.quantumbrain.org Spin & Consciousness Research]<br />
*[http://www.neuroquantology.com/journal/index.php/nq/issue/view/28 Spin & Consciousness Theory, NeuroQuantology March 2006 Special Issue]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Consciousness studies]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Huping_Hu
Huping Hu
2006-10-11T01:26:17Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''Huping Hu''', Ph.D., J.D., (born 1962) is a [[biophysicist]] and [[attorney]] in private practice. He is known in the small [[quantum mind]] circle for his proposal of a [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] with his collaborator Maoxin Wu. He is also somewhat known in the local Chinese community in [[Flushing, New York]] as a down-to-earth but courageous and tough attorney fighting for his clients' rights and interests.{{citation needed}}<br />
<br />
In 1985, he suggested in an article published in the little known Chinese magazine, Potential Science, that the [[entropy]] (thus, [[information]]) of any physical system based on the concept of "individual entropy" is conserved and intrinsically connected to the energy transformation and conservation law. This concept of entropy/information allows the existence of a "living" [[universe]] in which [[heat death]] due to the [[second law of thermodynamics]] could be avoided.<br />
<br />
In 2001, he proposed with his [[collaborator]] Maoxin Wu a novel mechanism of anesthetic action that says general [[anesthetic]]s produce [[unconsciousness]] by perturbing [[oxygen]] pathways in neural membranes and proteins. This view is not at all accepted by the [[scientific community]] at large. Indeed, there are no commonly accepted theory on how general anesthetics work, despite they have been in use for more than 150 years.{{citation needed}}<br />
<br />
The [[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]] was put forward by Huping Hu and his [[collaborator]] Maoxin Wu in 2002. Although published reviews, criticisms or comments on this theory are negligible to non-existent, it is well received at conferences and in private communications by some physicists and the like.{{citation needed}}<br />
<br />
He obtained his B.S. and M.S. from universities in [[China]] in 1983 and 1986 respectively. He then obtained his Ph.D. in [[biophysics]] from [[University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]] in 1991 and J.D. from [[New York Law School]] in 1998. He is admitted to practice law in the [[State of New York]] and the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York]] and the [[U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York]].<br />
<br />
==External links==<br />
*[http://www.quantumbrain.org Spin & Consciousness Research]<br />
*[http://www.lawyership.com Lawyership]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Living people|Hu, Huping]]<br />
[[Category:1962 births|Hu, Huping]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
Main Page
2006-10-11T01:24:41Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>Welcome to sciXplorer - an evolving encyclopedia.<br />
<br />
Items Available:<br />
<br><br />
[[Huping Hu]]<br />
<br><br />
[[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
Main Page
2006-10-11T01:24:05Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>Welcome to sciXplorer - an evolving encyclopedia.<br />
<br />
Entries Available:<br />
[[Huping Hu]]<br />
<br><br />
[[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
Main Page
2006-10-11T01:23:44Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>Welcome to sciXplorer - an evolving encyclopedia.<br />
<br />
Entries Available:<br />
[[Huping Hu]]<br />
[[Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory]]</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=sciXplorer:About
sciXplorer:About
2005-11-30T14:47:16Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>sciXplorer is operated and maintained by Science Association for the New Millennium, short name Scienca. It is an evolving science encyclopedia.<br />
<br />
SCIENCA also operates and maintains scienca.com, a science portal with open-access & open-review (OAOR). Scienca is created to address the needs of many creative individuals who want OAOR for their scientific work products. SCIENCA believes that through the process of OAOR good scientific ideas/results will survive but bad ones will simply "die" similar to what happens under Darwin's theory of evolution. The exploratory work on the feasibility of such an institution has been conducted by Huping Hu, Ph.D., J.D. <br />
<br />
SCIENCA shows great respects to all scientifically creative individuals. SCIENCA is an archive/portal with equal access and equal review rights where scientists and other learned individuals archive their papers and express their views on equal footing. In doing so, SCIENCA hopes that it will be able to speed up the progress of science and let " a hundred flowers blossom" instead of a few. <br />
<br />
Scienca is sponsored by QuantumDream, Inc. For questions, comments and suggestions, please e-mail us at info@scienca.com. You can also reach us through voice/fax at 212-898-1103. <br />
<br />
Snail Mail: Scienca, c/o QuantumDream, Inc., P O. Box 267 Stony Brook, NY 11790-0267</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=sciXplorer:General_disclaimer
sciXplorer:General disclaimer
2005-11-30T14:46:56Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>sciXplorer is operated and maintained by Science Association for the New Millennium, short name Scienca. Scienca is sponsored by QuantumDream, Inc. It is not responsible for any of the Articles, Comments, Reviews, or User Names, as the poster of the particular Article, Comment, Review, or User Name on Scienca - Science Association for the New Millenium assumes full responsibility.<br />
<br />
Scienca disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, reliability, operability, or availability of information or material displayed on this site. Scienca disclaims any responsibility for any harm resulting from downloading or accessing any information or material on Scienca.<br />
<br />
Scienca contains links to other Internet sites. These links are provided solely as a convenience to you and are not endorsements of any products or services in such sites, and no information in such site has been endorsed or approved by Scienca. These third party sites may also contain opinions and viewpoints of third parties that do not necessarily coincide with our opinions and viewpoints. Those sites may also have privacy policies different than our own privacy policy.<br />
<br />
All materials, information, products & services included on Scienca are provided "AS IS", with no warranties whatsoever. Scienca expressly disclaims to the fullest extent permitted by law all express, implied, and statutory warranties. Scienca disclaims any warranties for services or goods received through or advertised on Scienca.<br />
<br />
All Logo's and Images are property of their respectful owner. All HTML and Databases on are ©Copyright 2005 Scienca.</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
Main Page
2005-11-27T01:37:03Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>Welcome to sciXplorer - an evolving [[science]] encyclopedia.</div>
Scienca
https://scienca.org/wiki/index.php?title=sciXplorer:General_disclaimer
sciXplorer:General disclaimer
2005-11-27T01:31:32Z
<p>Scienca: </p>
<hr />
<div>sciXplorer is operated and maintained by Science Association for the New Millenium, short name Scienca. Scienca is sponsored by QuantumDream, Inc. It is not responsible for any of the Articles, Comments, Reviews, or User Names, as the poster of the particular Article, Comment, Review, or User Name on Scienca - Science Association for the New Millenium assumes full responsibility.<br />
<br />
Scienca disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, reliability, operability, or availability of information or material displayed on this site. Scienca disclaims any responsibility for any harm resulting from downloading or accessing any information or material on Scienca.<br />
<br />
Scienca contains links to other Internet sites. These links are provided solely as a convenience to you and are not endorsements of any products or services in such sites, and no information in such site has been endorsed or approved by Scienca. These third party sites may also contain opinions and viewpoints of third parties that do not necessarily coincide with our opinions and viewpoints. Those sites may also have privacy policies different than our own privacy policy.<br />
<br />
All materials, information, products & services included on Scienca are provided "AS IS", with no warranties whatsoever. Scienca expressly disclaims to the fullest extent permitted by law all express, implied, and statutory warranties. Scienca disclaims any warranties for services or goods received through or advertised on Scienca.<br />
<br />
All Logo's and Images are property of their respectful owner. All HTML and Databases on are ©Copyright 2005 Scienca.</div>
Scienca